Along with the civil servants of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United States 1,000 lives that have been releasedDonald Trump 2.0 government reform plan Although the person who has a role in creating such policies Elon Musk Will be shaded out of the White House
Reflecting the defeat ofLiberal Technology Group That has a role in the design of foreign policy (The Blob) to the stream of ideasConservativeAnd the heat of the current Make America Great Again (MAGA)
MAGA Believe that the United States should end the role ‘World Police’ That is a waste of budget And the nest but will pull the number one superpowers in the world Into the unnecessary conflict
When he would stigma Donald Trump The source of all problems would not be quite correct. Because if looking at each other in real side, Trump is not the person who creates this condition of the mess in any way.
But justThose who seize the opportunity to win the president’s chair Through the straddling of the people’s repression That was affected byEconomic poisoningSlow down the world after the COVID-9 virus epidemic.
At the same time, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the United States intended to almost 1% or an average of 60,000-70 billion dollars from the annual budget of the state to support the assistance mission to improve the quality of life forPeople in the 3rd world country As a branches of Soft Power every year
The people of the United States still lack concrete understanding that the country will receive from the case of the government. Republican and Democrat atBring the tax intoHuman rights ecosystem Infrastructure development And the environment in the Middle East, Africa or even Southeast Asia
Together with the past 2-3 decades The reputation of civil society organizations (NGOS/Ingos) within the United States are not very good. From some parts have been issued in a non -transparent business operation
There is also a sound fromCommunity policyWithin the networkBrain Finance Institute (Thinktanks) that are skeptical about the Independent Contractors that may not seriously help the 3rd World Country Country. Resulting in the direction of the confidence crisis that people have to civil society in general
The role and political influence of NGOS/Ingos has been questioned for many years. Especially after the year 2015-2020 onwards
Until the policy debate in the group The Blob That the distribution of funds to help the 3rd world country inEnvironmental dimension Including human rights What is the diversity and equality (Dei) promoting US foreign strategies on the world stage?
Like A. Wess Mitchell One of the major members of Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) that criticized the reasoning of the mission.US diplomatsPresent
Which was determined to pour the weight on the concept of sexual diversity Environmental conservation And human rights Until the modern diplomats have almost no time to practice field skills in international negotiations
The more worrisome is that the trend of the capital allocation into the NGOS/Ingos circle is not just limited to the United States. But still expanding the scope to the rich countries in the organization for Economic Co-‘PEWERATION and Development (OECD).
WhetherGermanyWhich announced the budget in the said region more than 5,000 million dollars since 2024EnglandItself also shows a clear position that will adjust the proportion of the 3rd World Country to 40% in order to allocate to military missions instead.
LikeNetherlandsWhich has a limited plan for supporting the UNITED Nations mission, which is contrary to the diploma in the international community Especially the rich countries
The United States, Canada, England and the Western Hemisphere, had been in 1970 under Young Resolution 2626 (XXV) Very much
In addition, Unga Resolution 2626 (XXV) is a request for cooperation from the government leader from the developed countries to help allocate 0.7% from the country’s national income (GNI) to spend on helping the inferior/developing country (ODA).
The days have passed almost 60 years. To date, only 5 countries from the OECD group began with Denmark. Sweden, Norway Luxembourg, followed by Germany.
Clearly, there are only 5 countries that are willing to help the United States bear the financial burden on taking care of the 3rd World Country.
The Donald Trump will use the issue to be impersonated from the world of the world.
On the other hand Things that should be done rather than creating hate to face. Donald Trump Then saw that it was to accept the reality that it would be sick. If having to wait for the hopes for the project and budget that the US government had given to the USAID will be demolished in the near future.
Or until a new whisper, who came back to Elon Musk’s thoughts, Donald Trump leaves the trade negotiation stage-tax walls back to allocate funds to help the 3rd World Country.
Because as is well known in the dimension of strategic calculation that, for Trump leaders, being dubbed from their base as ‘Winner in the trade negotiation game’ With a higher value than being praised as ‘Revolutionary NGOS/Ingos’ Be infinite
And has a high trend in the case that after Trump returned to demolish the USAID reform plan, as many parties expect May be trapped with new conditions that capitalists have to use resources or additional services from the US business groups in the same way as the project.Coin businessThat China has done to many neighboring countries
Of course, searching for new high potential scholarships to replace the lump sum that has been received from USAID and other organizations that have a role in NGOS/Ingos in the 3rd world country, which is no different from running in the maze.
One of the important obstacles that almost every NGOS/Ingos have to experience the different. This industry is driven by the system and network (Cronyism), no different from the government.
The most unlucky person is often an activist/activist who does not consider the importance of science called ‘Hand coordinating ten directions’ (Know-WHO), a variable that can help to reduce damage/increase the opportunity to survive the organization.
On the other hand, the advantage will fall at a group of people or civil society organizations that are able to have old merit. ‘Next line’ To the kind adults, whether within or abroad, allowing to help as a temporary plan
In the NGOS/Ingos relatives, a short time ago, an experienced activist had suggested that the Thai NGOS/Ingos group survived the fund shortage crisis byOpen to accept donations or fund raising (Fundrasing)
LikeBurmese political activistWhich was established in the Burmese community to earn a special income in Chiang Mai Tak and Bangkok to bring the local government of the Aung San Suu Kyi (Nug) sponsors (NUG) used to war with Min Aung Hlaing, which is a reasonable idea.
Especially when considered together with the context in Thai society that will have a person to raise personal money to NGOS/Ingos that are famous for movement. “Cable destroys the country” According to the water of the Thai conservative media, how much
To be enough for NGOS/Ingos to play the role of human rights concepts Freedom of comment and democracy to escape all this crisis.
Issues that should not be ignored here are the factors of quantity. Currently, there are only 1 million Thai people, different from Burma, beyond the sea with over 4-5 million people, or even the sea that sends money back to help the Deng Xiaoping government in the 1970s-1980s. There are already 20 million people.
SoThe ability to raise funds from the Thai community is therefore less than other countries.That had already been successful Not to mention the limitations of the above methods that are quite accumulated than the donation will be enough to allow the NGOS/Ingos to move forward without interruption.
The most important thing is that all parties have to understand each other that Thai society is quite different from the United States in the dimension of fund raising for great movement (Greatr Cause). Not the main culture that most people accept or are happy to understand.
Those who propose the guidelines that do not know the Gala Dinner event for representatives from NGOS/Ingos. Human rights lineTo queue up the donation box from ‘Philanthropists’ is not a way of action in Thailand.
Probably a strange image If a famous activist lawyer appears toRaise fundsFor the amendment of the law to support the freedom of expression in the Gala Dinner of Thailand.
Size in the United States today Businessmen and billionaires who want to maintain good relationships withGovernment Trump 2.0 Also reserved the attitude of the role of philanthropists
The issues that most people tend to overlook are the proportion of the donations of the philanthropists in the universe of the capital and the donors (Donors) are only about 10,000 million US dollars.
While the financial support that each government poured to NGOS/Ingos each year, not less than 200,000 million US dollars This number is probably enough to help clear that the project should be written to ask for funds from ‘who’ will have more opportunities to be allocated.
That has been arranged like this It’s not that it will be so bad because many NGOS/Ingos in the ASEAN country have different techniques to survive.
Some groups choose to solve immediate problems by focusing onAccepting donations online Parallel to asking for cooperation for all teams to receive a half salary. (Or not accepted at all) and then spend your free time after work, earn a little extra income from trading in order to support the quality of life each day.
Or some groups that are classified through hot and cold for a long time May hurry to contact the secondary capital from the United States Whether Sweden, Canada, Switzerland Or even the Netherlands All of which have a USAID -like organization to allocate ODA funds to the 3rd World Country.
Important tips and advantages for those who survive are still a matter of ‘Who do you know?’ Formerly, because the funding source itself has the expected criteria and does not use a lot of charity to agree to submit the funds. 50,000-100,000 US dollar for ‘New player’ Which is not well known in the NGOS/Ingos circle
Finally, what should be aware of above is As long as the money for the quality of life, the 3rd world population is not concentrated, but only the G7 and OECD countries in NGOS/Ingos should not block their own opportunities and survival to the same choice.
Because in this vast world community, there are still many new industrial countries that are ready to reach out to have a lot of share in the market and industry.
Especially BRICS countries such as India, Brazil, Russia, Arab Republic of Emirates Or even China that tries to allocate the 3rd World Country to support at least 5,000-6,000 million dollars per year.
Like Russia, which began to penetrate the influence of power to the United States and China within the Southeast Asian regulations through Laos, Myanmar, Vietnam and Indonesia.
The main point is how many people would dare to contact these scholarships. With concerns about the exchange conditions for receiving capital Which brings some relevant stands that may affect the image Or conflicting with some capital sources
But it is an interesting solution for groups that give weight to the survival of the organization. By exchanging conditions that are hard to comply with some terms and evil for a moment until the USAID or the capital resource organization within the United States will return in the future
This unpopular opin is only a aspect that wants to reflect the trends/options of each scene only. As for each NGOS/Ingos, however, however, will choose their own path, but
But the undeniable fact is that the main demonstrators that monopolize enormous funds are distributed to NGOS/Ingos that move in the 3rd world country. ‘state’.
