The World Health Organization (WHO) promotes the abortive pills in the list of essential medicines. And the novelty is that from this year the warning does it without even more, in force since 2005, according to which these pills – whose use, mind you, is always immoral – should be used “only where legally allowed or culturally acceptable”. Therefore, for the UN agency, the abortive pills would be an “essential drug” to eliminate a singular “disease”, that is, the innocent children in the uterus.
One more shadow for the WHOwhich adds to the recent scandal on black funding of which we wrote on these pages, to the harassment and to the totalitarian bans in the Covid years.
So, those who should deal and worry about health dethe humanitycoordinating the efforts of the individual states for this purpose, MifePristone and Misoprostolo inserted, without any exception, in the 2025 list of essential drugs; List published on September 5 and which is suggested to all governments and countries of the world. This is the 24th list of “essential drugs” prepared by WHO: these are preparations that according to the agency “meet the priority health needs of a population (…) selected taking into account the prevalence of diseases and the relevance for public health, tests of effectiveness and safety and the comparative cost-effectiveness relationship. They are intended to be available in functioning health systems at any time, in appropriate dosage forms, of guaranteed quality and affordable prices for individuals and health systems ». This list of medicines and rules of administration is updated and published every two years, “with the intention of acting as a guide for the countries or regional authorities who intend to adopt or adapt them according to local priorities and therapeutic guidelines for the development and updating of the national lists of essential drugs (…) for a more rational or appropriate use and reduce costs for both health systems and patients”. This time, in fact, the list contains a section dedicated to abortive “drugs”, without any warning that these substances are not legal or culturally accepted everywhere. Therefore, the “quality jump” is clear: chemical compounds that eliminate the fetus are, for the WHO, essential everywhere and for anyone.
The reaction of pro organizations vita To this absurd, murderous and contradictory decision compared to what should be the mission of a health agency, it was immediate. According to Dr. Ingrid Skop, vice -president and director of the medical affairs of the Charlotte Lozier Institute, it is worrying that these substances are recommended all over the world, also because they, in addition to being fatal for children in the womb, “have a rate of complications four times higher than that of surgical abortion. Up to one in five women, a complication will undergo and one out of twenty will have to undergo surgery ». In addition, a recent study “noted that more than a third of women who made use of abortive drugs was not prepared for the extent of the pain and bleeding to which he had to cope with”. Dr. Skop herself said that the WHO decision is aimed at implementing a “world’s” eugenic control program “.
We remember for completeness that according to the WHO “the progressive realization of human rights requires that all individuals have access to quality health care, including services complete with abortion assistance, which include information, abortion management and post-abortion assistance. The lack of access to a safe, timely, accessible and respectful abortion represents a risk not only for the physical, but also mental and social well -being of women and girls “. Furthermore, according to the WHO, “to ensure that women and girls have access to abortion assistance based on concrete tests, that is, safe, respectful and non -discriminatory, it is essential to achieve the objectives of sustainable development (OSS) relating to health and well -being (OSS3) and gender equality (OSS5)”. It is the confirmation of what was mentioned at the beginning: the children conceived are considered as a serious illness to be eradicated. This short circuit of reason would be enough, combined with the blackmail and economic conditioning in place in WHO, to arrange the immediate closure of the agency.
At this pointit is to be wondered why Italy has not followed the example of the United States of Donald Trump so far, interrupting all the funding and arranging the withdrawal from this WHO which promotes eugenics and nascituri murders.
