Switzerland is considering introducing parental leave, a move initially viewed as revolutionary. The National Council’s Social Commission, mirroring the Council of States, is exploring this option. However, the commission is advocating for flexibility rather than an outright expansion of leave for new parents, seeking a “pragmatic, permanent and politically majority -capable solution.”

the proposal involves a more flexible distribution of the existing 14 weeks of maternity leave and the 2-week paternity vacation. Critics argue this approach undermines the original intent of expanded parental leave.

the commission’s primary focus is on the legally mandated maternity leave, suggesting mothers may receive less than the current 3.5 months of leave. Proponents argue this aligns with “equality of the sexes” and evolving “social developments.”

Initiative Demands More Support

The concept of splitting the 16 weeks of parental leave originated from the FDP, securing a 15 to 9 vote in favor within the commission, supported by representatives from SP, greens, and GLP.

“This is a severe attack on the health of mother and child and a scandalous step backwards.”

However, the proposal faces strong opposition. Green President Lisa Mazzone accuses national councilors of undermining the protection of mothers post-birth, calling it “a severe attack on the health of mother and child and a scandalous step backwards.” Mazzone is a leading figure behind the family time initiative launched in April, advocating for 18 weeks of leave for both parents.

GLP National Councilor Patrick Häß criticizes the commission’s proposal,stating,”the proposal of the majority of commission is the idea of ​​parental leave. For me, that is two steps back rather of a step forward.” SP national councilor Barbara Gysi also opposes altering the 14 weeks of maternity leave, asserting, “It takes an expansion – but not at the expense of the mothers.”

“We Want to Give Parents More Flexibility”

FDP National Councilor Andri Silberschmidt, a new father, defends the proposal, stating, “We just want to give parents more flexibility.” He suggests parents should have the option to divide family time, with a mandatory minimum of eight weeks of leave for health reasons.

The debate was spurred by the canton of Geneva, where voters approved 24 weeks of parental leave in 2023. However, the Federal Council rejected this, citing incompatibility with federal law. The National Council’s social commission aims to accommodate such initiatives by allowing cantons to offer “more spacious” solutions.

The final outcome remains uncertain, pending decisions from both the Council of States and the National Council. Even a more expansive option faces challenges,with concerns about financial feasibility.Commission president Damian Müller (FDP/LU) emphasized that “the whole thing has a price tag.”