America’s Cup: All Blacks Sue INEOS Over Sponsorship Non-Payment
11 February 2025
INEOS Britannia was the flagship for several of the major INEOS brands – 2024 America’s Cup – Oct 18, 2024 © Ian Roman / America’s Cup
New Zealand Rugby has taken legal action against the petrochemical conglomerate INEOS Group over a $NZD48 million sponsorship deal. The dispute stems from INEOS’s alleged failure to pay the first year’s installment of an agreement initially valued at $NZD8 million per year for six years.
The Sponsorship Agreement
The deal was intended to span from 2022 to 2027, covering both the men’s and women’s All Blacks rugby teams. According to New Zealand Rugby, INEOS has not honored the agreement, leaving the organization with no choice but to pursue legal remedies.
INEOS Sports Investments Review
Recent reports indicate that INEOS is conducting a thorough review of its sports investments. The company plans to divest what it deems as “non-core assets,” a move that could directly impact its contractual obligations with New Zealand Rugby.
The controversy intensified following INEOS Britannia’s decision to split from its skipper, Sir Ben Ainslie, and his Athena Racing team. This separation from key leadership positions may signal a broader strategic shift within the organization.
Impact on Sponsorship
The legal action taken by New Zealand Rugby reflects the significant disruption in the sports licensing industry. The All Black sponsorship, once a cornerstone of INEOS’s sports portfolio, has disappeared from the official INEOS Sports website.
New Zealand Rugby’s statement to the Daily Telegraph emphasizes the non-payment of 2025’s sponsorship fee, a figure estimated at approximately $NZD4.5 million (USD$4.5 million). This breach has left the rugby governing body with serious financial ramifications.
Timeline and Strategy
The sponsorship issue appears to have been in the works for several months. According to sources, INEOS was inclined to terminate the deal mid-way through its six-year term, a decision that led to the deferred payment.
Ineos Sports has acknowledged its intention to challenge for the 38th America’s Cup but no longer references its rugby partnership on its website. The company must now navigate the politically charged waters of seeking a new British club to represent its lease for the next two Cups.
Consequences for the All Blacks
As a result of this legal dispute, New Zealand Rugby is expected to remove the INEOS logo from the All Blacks’ playing kit for the upcoming international matches in July. This decision underscores the importance of financial reliability in high-profile sports sponsorships.
The All Blacks fans and the sporting community anticipate the change with relative indifference, contrasting sharply with the negative reception received by the AIG sponsorship in 2012. AIG, in that case, honored its six-year deal valued at $NZD80 million, informing New Zealand Rugby of its intention not to renew well in advance.
Athena Racing and INEOS Britannia
Athena Racing, under Sir Ben Ainslie, significantly impacted INEOS Britannia’s America’s Cup strategy. Following the split, Athena Racing redirected its focus to Formula 1, leaving INEOS in the position of re-evaluating its America’s Cup participation and sponsorship of the All Blacks.
The breakup’s subsequent fallout includes changes on Athena Racing’s website. References to INEOS Britannia have been supplanted by mentions of “INEOS and Mercedes F1,” marking a shift in the team’s partnership strategy.
The Future of Sports Sponsorships
This legal battle highlights the risks associated with long-term sports sponsorships, especially when investing in multiple sporting ventures. INEOS’s financial reevaluation suggests that sports partnerships may become more selective, prioritizing investments in areas that align more closely with core business objectives.
For New Zealand Rugby, the challenge now lies in navigating the transition period without INEOS’s financial support. The organization must explore alternative sponsorship opportunities to ensure continued financial stability and operational continuity.
America’s Cup Challenges Ahead
The legal dispute between New Zealand Rugby and INEOS Group adds another layer of complexity to the already tumultuous America’s Cup landscape. The 38th America’s Cup announcement lacks specific details about the entry process for the 2027 event, leaving stakeholders and fans in a state of uncertainty.
Ineos Sports appears to be in a delicate position, balancing its participation in high-profile sailing events with considerations for financial pruning in other areas. The next steps for INEOS Britannia in reorganizing its team and securing sponsorship are crucial for continued involvement in the America’s Cup.
The saga surrounding INEOS’s sponsorship of the All Blacks and its America’s Cup ambitions demonstrates the volatile nature of major sporting sponsorships. As INEOS continues to reassess its portfolio, the future of high-stakes sports partnerships remains an open question.
Final Thoughts
The All Blacks’s decision to sue INEOS over the sponsorship deal reflects a significant financial breach and underscores the importance of contract enforcement. The ongoing situation in the America’s Cup adds another layer of complexity, as INEOS navigates the challenge of transitioning its investments and representations in the face of strategic realignment.
This legal battle could set a precedent for future sports sponsorships, emphasizing the need for robust financial backing and clear communication between sponsors and sporting entities.
Get Involved
What are your thoughts on this legal dispute and its impact on the sports industry? Join the conversation below. Don’t forget to subscribe for regular updates and share your insights on social media.