A hearing is scheduled for June 17 regarding the deployment of the National Guard in California,following a recent court decision.

Late Thursday, a federal judge issued an order just hours before a separate ordinance was set to take effect on friday.

US District Judge Charles Breyer determined that President Donald Trump‘s deployment of the National Guard was unlawful, infringing upon the Tenth Amendment and exceeding his legal authority.

The order specifically applied to the National Guard troops involved in the Los Angeles demonstrations, but not to the Marines, who were also deployed.Judge Breyer stated that he would not make a ruling regarding the navies, as they had not yet been deployed in the streets.

California Governor Gavin Newsom initiated legal action to prevent the deployment of the National Guard against the state’s wishes. California afterward filed an emergency request, seeking to prevent the National Guard from participating in police operations.

Newsom argued that the troops were initially deployed to safeguard federal buildings, and he sought to prevent their involvement in protecting immigration agents during raids, asserting that the National Guard’s involvement would escalate tensions and incite civil unrest.

“Political maneuver”

The Trump management characterized the complaint as a “massive political maneuver endangering American lives” in its official response on Wednesday.

Judge Breyer concluded that Donald Trump had not properly mobilized the national Guard.

Major General Scott Sherman stated in an interview with the Associated Press and another media outlet that approximately 500 National Guard soldiers had been trained to assist agents during immigration operations. Immigration officials have disseminated photos of National Guard soldiers providing security for agents.

Generally, governors have the authority to mobilize the National Guard, but the president can deploy these troops under specific circumstances. Donald Trump federalized the members of the California National Guard under Title 10 authority.

The complaint argued that Title 10 requires the president to consult with the governors before issuing orders to the National Guard.

Brett Shumate, representing the federal government, contended that President Trump had followed the law by informing the general in charge of the troops of his decision and that he possessed the authority to call on the guard even if he had not done so.

In a document submitted before thursday’s hearing,the Ministry of Justice asserted that Donald Trump’s orders were not subject to judicial review.

“massive political maneuver endangering American lives”

Demonstrations against immigration raids in Los Angeles intensified after Donald Trump’s call and have since spread to other cities,including Boston,Chicago,and Seattle.

Federal immigration agents have conducted arrests in locations such as Home Depot parking lots and other businesses, creating fear within immigrant communities, following the Trump administration’s announcement of plans to considerably increase arrests as part of its immigration crackdown.

The navies have not yet been seen in Los Angeles, and the guard troops had limited interaction with the demonstrators.

Dozens of mayors from the Los Angeles region convened on Wednesday to demand an end to the raids and the withdrawal of the troops.