The ending of Rules of Honor focuses on the outcome of the trial of Colonel Terry Childers and the political and moral consequences of the affair. The prosecution attempted to prove that Childers ordered fire on an unarmed crowd outside the US embassy in Yemen, resulting in dozens of civilian casualties.
The defense, led by Colonel Hodges, instead argued that there were armed men among the demonstrators and that the order had been given to save the marines under attack. The most delicate moment of the trial comes when the prosecution recalls episodes from the past in Vietnam, by having a spared North Vietnamese officer testify years earlier by Childers. The intent is to paint the defendant as a ruthless officer. However, under cross-examination it emerges that even on that occasion Childers acted to protect his men. The defensive line strengthens: his decisions, however extreme, have always been guided by duty towards his subordinates.
Another key point is the embassy security videotapepotentially crucial evidence that mysteriously disappeared after being sent to the office of National Security Advisor Sokal. Despite not being able to produce the film in court, Hodges manages to insinuate the doubt that there was a political cover-up to shift the responsibility onto Childers and protect the diplomatic balance.
The jury issues a detailed verdict: Childers was convicted of a minor violation, but acquitted of the more serious charges of murder and unworthy conduct. It is a decision that avoids the ultimate ruin of his career and, above all, recognizes the complexity of the situation on the field. The epilogue closes the score: Childers honorably discharges himself from the Marines. Sokal is convicted of destroying evidence, while Ambassador Mourain loses his position for perjury. The final symbolic image is the mutual military salute between Childers and the former Vietnamese officer: a recognition between soldiers who shared the brutality of war.
They are Loro – The Seduced It is one of today’s best sellers.
