Hallo,
On x I happened to find a “cult trainer” who I find to be very dangerous.
He reaches a lot of people (even though he has so few followers) and this could block the adoption of Bitcoin, while at the same time only making weak arguments against Roman. Every German (DACH) Bitcoiner knows Roman aka. Block trainer but with such a “sect trainer” unnecessary countermeasures are released. We voluntarily look at Blocktrainer but he destroys this freedom with meaningless arguments, but in the same breath (unfortunately) he gets a lot of recognition.
Can’t you report people like that? Freedom is all well and good, but that’s totally low-level…
What do you think about that? And to the Blocktrainer team: Can’t you display it? It’s gross below the belt… (at least in my opinion…).
1 like
I see it in a much more relaxed way. In the end, this is satire and falls under freedom of art and freedom of expression, even if you may find it tasteless or unnecessary. For me, an account like this shows one thing above all: Bitcoin – and especially Roman – have now become so relevant for some people that they are a real thorn in their side.
If someone invests time, energy and effort into setting up their own account, analyzing videos in detail and even editing them extensively, then this is more of a form of involuntary recognition than a real danger. Indifference would be much more problematic for Bitcoin than ridicule.
And regardless of this: Bitcoin needs no novel, no influencers, no defense teams, no politics… If Bitcoin prevails, it will be because of its fundamental properties – and if not, then no YouTube channel will help. In the end, the long-term benefits in real life determine it.
2 “likes”
I also see it as completely relaxed.
- Does this really fall under freedom of expression (I don’t know every post and whether it is personally insulting or slandering)
- It’s a good place to argue with someone from the other side – just get involved and see how well you understand Bitcoin yourself
What do you want to “report”? It is not without a certain irony that as a Bitcoiner, who indirectly pays homage to the decentralization of the asset, you want to report different opinions or a satire of Roman and Bitcoin to a central office because that goes too far.
PS: I find it difficult to take both seriously.
3 “likes”
I have to clarify this further 
Without the written or spoken word, fundamental properties of a system that relies on people cannot spread. What Bitcoin does not rely on are individual entities. So individual politicians, developers and influencers. A lot of them can fail, but as long as there are enough of them, things will continue. It’s like the technical decentralization of Bitcoin. Bitcoin needs the node operators, but not a specific node operator. In this respect, Bitcoin really resembles an organism. A living being is dependent on the body’s own cells, but it is not dependent on every single cell. Bitcoin is like an organism whose body extends across the entire earth. It is therefore difficult and unlikely to kill it.
1 like
“Fan” comes from Fanatic…
Real fans often show their love in strange ways
I also took a look at the page. If that’s supposed to be the complete criticism, that’s really thin. In terms of content, there is really nothing usable coming from the colleague.
Haha, thanks for the tip, I’ll keep an eye on it.
If this is your own
I also like the glaring misspelling in the account name, like “I’m so stupid, I don’t even know how to write satire properly and I have no idea what I’m actually doing here, but look what Roman said.”
What I would change if I were you are the derogatory comments; they make the whole thing cheap and unappetizing. Lean more into Socratic irony and leave it open whether you don’t actually like what was said. Make the bio more neutral and ideally don’t add your own two cents anywhere, but rather let the quotes speak for themselves – that would sharpen the humor a lot.
(Sorry if it’s not your account, then the only compliment I can give you is that your post was hilariously exaggerated, especially the punchline “we watch the block trainer voluntarily, but the sect trainer destroys our freedom.”)
All I read here is “Mimimi, I don’t like what I see and that’s why it has to be banned immediately!”
