Researchers at the University of Coimbra in Portugal have identified a more efficient lunar trajectory that reduces fuel consumption by 58.80 meters per second. By simulating 30 million different routes using the theory of functional connections, the team found a path that could significantly lower the costs of future lunar missions.
The discovery, detailed in a recent Astrodynamics paper, provides a new mathematical method for optimizing the movement of spacecraft between Earth and the Moon. By identifying a trajectory that requires less velocity change to maintain, the researchers have addressed one of the most persistent economic hurdles in space exploration: the high cost of propellant.
Optimization via Functional Connections
The research team, led by Allan Kardec de Almeida Júnior at the University of Coimbra, moved away from traditional methods of trajectory planning. Instead of relying on standard spaceflight computer simulations, which can be computationally expensive and time-consuming, the study employed the theory of functional connections. This mathematical framework allows for the solving of constrained optimization problems more directly.
To find the most efficient path, the researchers simulated 30 million different routes. These calculations were compared against hundreds of thousands of previous simulations conducted by other research groups. The result was the identification of a single route that offers a reduction in fuel consumption costs of 58.80 meters per second (m/s) compared to previously known calculations.
The distinction between simulation-based planning and functional connection theory is significant for mission design. While NASA and other space agencies must account for complex variables—including trajectory design, orbit reconstruction, and the constant tracking of a spacecraft’s position and velocity—the new mathematical approach provides a more efficient starting point for these complex calculations.
The Velocity-to-Fuel Correlation
In orbital mechanics, the amount of fuel a spacecraft must carry is directly tied to the changes in velocity, or delta-v, required to complete a maneuver. Small reductions in the required velocity can result in massive savings in mass, which in turn reduces the size and cost of the launch vehicle required to send the craft into space.
When it comes to space travel, every meter per second equates to a massive amount of fuel consumption.
Allan Kardec de Almeida Júnior, researcher at the University of Coimbra
The 58.80 m/s savings identified by the Coimbra team may appear small in a vacuum, but when scaled to the requirements of heavy-lift missions or repeated cargo deliveries to the lunar surface, the cumulative effect on mission budgets is substantial. Reducing the velocity requirement allows for either more payload to be delivered to the Moon or a reduction in the total mass of the spacecraft at launch.
Orbital Mechanics and the L1 Lagrange Point
The optimized trajectory identified by the researchers is a two-part path. The first stage involves a spacecraft leaving Earth’s orbit and traveling toward the Moon’s orbit around the L1 Lagrange point. This specific point in space is a gravitational equilibrium where the pull of the Earth and the pull of the Moon cancel each other out.

By utilizing the L1 Lagrange point as a transitional marker in the trajectory, the researchers were able to map a path that minimizes the energy required to move between the two celestial bodies. While the study is not a total solution for all spaceflight planning requirements, it establishes a more efficient baseline for navigating the gravitational environment between Earth and the Moon.
As space agencies and private companies increase their focus on establishing a sustained presence on the lunar surface, the ability to mathematically refine these paths will likely become a standard part of mission architecture. The Coimbra study suggests that the most efficient routes may not be found through brute-force simulation, but through more sophisticated mathematical frameworks that can account for the complex gravitational interplay of the Earth-Moon system.
