Roger Marie Keraval and Marie Noëlle Le Fur Modify Matrimonial Agreement
Table of Contents
QUIMPER – M. Roger Marie Keraval and Mme Marie Noëlle Le Fur, residents of Ergué-gabéric (29500), have decided to alter their matrimonial regime. According to an act received by me Françoise Pinson-Gautier, notary in Quimper, on 09/18/2025, the couple, married in LANDUDAL (29510) on 03/25/1972, have opted for a worldwide community regime.
Initially married under the community of acquests due to the absence of a prenuptial agreement, M. Keraval, born in Ergué-Gabéric (29500) on 02/26/1948, and Mme Le Fur, born in Landudal (29510) on 07/28/1948, are now subject to the terms of the universal community.
Matrimonial regime change
this change allows for a complete merging of assets and debts. Creditors have a three-month window to oppose this modification.
Oppositions may be made within three months and must be notified by registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt or by a bailiff’s feat.
Any opposition must be formally communicated to the study of Me Françoise Pinson-Gautier via registered letter with acknowledgment of receipt or through a bailiff’s feat. In the event of a formal opposition, the spouses retain the right to seek judicial approval for the change from the judicial court.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a matrimonial regime?
A matrimonial regime defines how a couple manages their assets and debts during their marriage.
How can a matrimonial regime be changed?
A matrimonial regime can be changed through a notarial act, and in some cases, requires court approval.
What is the “community of acquests” regime?
Under this regime, assets acquired during the marriage are jointly owned, while assets owned before the marriage remain separate.
What is the “universal community” regime?
Under this regime, all assets and debts, regardless of when they were acquired, are jointly owned by the couple.
What recourse do creditors have when a matrimonial regime is changed?
Creditors have a limited time (typically three months) to oppose the change if they believe it will negatively impact their ability to recover debts.
