The Legal Landscape of Defensible Space

Recent legislation,specifically Law no. 2023-580 enacted on July 10, 2023, underscores the critical importance of strengthening the prevention and the fight against intensification and extension of the fire risk. This law introduces updated stipulations concerning the legal obligations for brush clearing, also known as fuel reduction, in areas susceptible to wildfires. These regulations,as outlined in articles L.131-10 and L134-6 of the forest code, mandate that properties within 200 meters of woodlands, forests, plantations, moors, or scrublands maintain a cleared perimeter.

While the 200-meter rule remains constant, local municipalities, under their police powers, possess the authority to modify the specific execution procedures. These adaptations might include adjustments to the minimum height of trimmed branches or specifying the types of vegetation that must be preserved.Compliance wiht these local ordinances is, without exception, mandatory for all property owners.

The owner of the land is in principle responsible for the Old, according to article L.134-8 of the forest code, vis-à-vis the administration: the municipality, the prefecture.

FNAIM Legal Expert

According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), creating defensible space is a crucial step in protecting homes from wildfires. Defensible space provides a buffer between a building and the vegetation that surrounds it, slowing or stopping the spread of wildfire to the home.

Tenant or Landlord: Who’s Responsible for Brush Clearing?

A common point of confusion arises when a property is rented: who bears the duty for maintaining the green spaces and ensuring compliance with brush clearing laws? Many tenants are unaware that they can be held accountable for the upkeep of the property’s outdoor areas.

According to Article 7 of Law No. 89-462 of July 6, 1989, and decree 87-712 of August 26, 1987, the responsibility for routine maintenance of private gardens can be assigned to the tenant. These legal texts stipulate that tenants are responsible for the current maintenance of the accommodation and in particular the maintenance of the private gardens.

Though, the tenant’s obligations are not all-encompassing. The tenant is primarily responsible for tasks that fall under the umbrella of common maintenance. This includes activities such as mowing the lawn, cutting brush, and trimming low-hanging branches. More substantial operations, such as pruning large trees or tree removal, typically remain the responsibility of the landlord.

The tenant is responsible for the only operations which fall under common maintenance,for example the mowing of the grass,the cut of the brush and the low branches of the trees. On the contrary, more important operations, such as pruning large trees or slaughter of trees, cannot be considered as a common maintenance at the expense of the tenant.

FNAIM Legal Expert

Lease Agreements: Clarifying Responsibilities

To prevent disputes, landlords can include a specific clause in the lease agreement that clearly outlines the tenant’s obligations regarding green space maintenance. This clause should be unambiguous and explicitly state the maintenance methods expected. Tenants should carefully review the lease agreement before signing to understand their responsibilities.

Consequences of Negligence

If a lease agreement assigns maintenance responsibility to the tenant, and the tenant fails to fulfill these obligations, they can be held liable for any resulting damages. This negligence can have serious repercussions.

The landlord can pursue legal action to enforce brush clearing, seek compensation for damages, or even terminate the lease in cases of sufficiently serious breaches. In extreme scenarios, where the failure to clear brush leads to a fire with severe consequences, such as endangering lives or causing injuries, both the tenant and the landlord (if applicable) could face criminal charges.

The lessor can request forced execution clearing, damages for the damage suffered, the termination of the lease in the event of a resolutory or judicial termination in the event of sufficiently serious shortcomings. If the absence of brushcutting leads to a fire having serious consequences – for example the endangerment of others, involuntary injuries … – the tenant’s criminal responsibility could be engaged concurrently with that of the lessor if necessary.

FNAIM Legal Expert