In a significant turn of events, Harare Mayor Jacob Mafume has been fined US$300 for submitting false information under oath. The commission of inquiry, which investigates governance issues at Town House since 2017, found Mafume guilty of misleading statements concerning his place of residence.

The Investigation

Justice Maphios Cheda, chair of the commission, conducted an inspection at a property on Coronation Road in Harare, which Mafume had claimed as his home. However, the property was actually a vehicle auction site, contradicting his testimony.

Mafume’s Admissions

Justice Cheda questioned Mafume about the inconsistency in his declaration. Initially, Mafume attempted to justify his claim by stating that his residence was located two blocks away from the auction site. However, the commission chair dismissed his explanation, maintaining that Mafume had misled the inquiry.

“Yes, my Lord, I take full responsibility for my actions, and I would like to extend my heartfelt apologies to the commission for the misleading information. I have indeed given the rest of my evidence to the commission,” Mafume admitted during the proceedings.

The Sentence

Recognizing it as Mafume’s first offense, Justice Cheda imposed a sentence of US$300 or three months in prison, both of which were suspended for five years. This sentence was conditional on Mafume not violating Sections 13 or 14 of the Commission’s Inquiry Act during the suspension period.

“In light of that, the commission will impose the following sentence on you: Mr. Jacob Mafume, you are sentenced to pay a fine of US$300 or three months’ imprisonment, which is wholly suspended for five years, on the condition that during that period, you are not convicted of contravening Section 13 or 14 of the Commission’s Inquiry Act,” Justice Cheda explained.

Commendation for Cooperation

While acknowledging the public embarrassment and media scrutiny Mafume endured, Justice Cheda noted that such reactions were sufficient punishment. He also highlighted Mafume’s cooperation in providing clear and concise evidence on other matters, although this case was an unfortunate lapse from the mayor’s otherwise diligent testimony.

“The embarrassment which has engulfed you from the time you sat down and heard about this matter, the media spreading bad news to you, that is enough punishment,” Justice Cheda noted, stressing the distinction between this isolated incident and habitual dishonesty.

Conclusion

Mafume’s admission and cooperation during the inquiry process prevented a harsher sentence and highlighted the importance of honesty and transparency in public service. This incident serves as a reminder of the consequences of false statements, emphasizing the critical role of integrity in governance.

What’s Next

As Mafume moves forward, it will be crucial for him to uphold the standard of transparency required in public office. The commission’s decision to suspend the sentence creates an opportunity for a fresh start, provided Mafume adheres to the terms of his probation.