The Primate’s Viewpoint: Free Will and the Roots of Conflict

In a recent interview, Metropolitan Epiphanius, Primate of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine (PCU), offered a profound perspective on the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. He suggests that the war’s origins lie not solely in geopolitical factors, but also in humanity’s persistent choice of evil over good. This viewpoint emphasizes the role of free will,a concept central to many theological doctrines.

We, people, always want to find the reason somewhere: why did God allow this? But we are free, that is, the Lord gave us freedom of choice. We choose between good and evil. And problably during this time we very frequently enough chose evil. That is, everything depends on the will of man.
Metropolitan Epiphanius, Primate of the Orthodox Church of ukraine

Epiphanius argues that individuals and nations, endowed with the capacity to discern right from wrong, have frequently succumbed to malevolence. This,he believes,has paved the way for the current crisis. His statement resonates with the broader theological discussion on the problem of evil and theodicy,which attempts to reconcile the existence of a benevolent God with the presence of suffering in the world.

National Identity and european Aspirations

The Metropolitan further elaborated on ukraine’s distinct trajectory, emphasizing the nation’s commitment to freedom, truth, and integration with the european community. He contrasted this with Russia’s actions,suggesting that the Russian leadership has actively directed its will against ukraine’s pursuit of self-determination.

We have chosen our growth vector clearly.We want freedom, we want to live in truth, live where really European values reign (yes, we don’t accept something), we want to be an integral part of the European community. And therefore it depends on people.
Metropolitan Epiphanius, Primate of the orthodox Church of Ukraine

This perspective highlights the clash of values and ideologies at the heart of the conflict. Ukraine’s desire to align with European norms and institutions stands in stark contrast to Russia’s self-proclaimed role as a defender of “customary values,” a claim Epiphanius vehemently disputes.

Challenging “Traditional values” and the Sanctity of War

Epiphanius directly challenged Russia’s portrayal of itself as a guardian of traditional values, pointing to the contradiction inherent in blessing a war, which he unequivocally defines as evil. He referenced Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew’s condemnation of the conflict, emphasizing that war can never be considered sacred.

This stance aligns with the views of many religious leaders globally, who have consistently denounced the violence and called for peaceful resolution. The concept of a “holy war” is frequently enough viewed with skepticism and condemnation within mainstream religious discourse, notably when it leads to widespread suffering and destruction.

The Illusion of Truce: A Critical Examination

Amidst the ongoing conflict, Russia’s declaration of an “Easter truce” was met with skepticism. While presented as a gesture of goodwill, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reported continued Russian assault actions, undermining the credibility of the ceasefire. According to reports from the Ukrainian Armed Forces, even during the supposed truce period, significant casualties and military activity persisted.

Pavel Lacquichuk,head of the Globalistics Center for Globalistics,suggested that the “Easter Trick” was a form of trolling,potentially aimed at figures like former US president Donald Trump. This highlights the complex layers of political maneuvering and information warfare intertwined with the military conflict.

The Human Cost: A Stark Reminder

The conflict in ukraine continues to exact a devastating human toll. Reports from the front lines paint a grim picture of ongoing battles and casualties.the use of heavy weaponry and FPV drones underscores the intensity and brutality of the fighting, serving as a constant reminder of the urgent need for a peaceful and just resolution.