Convicts cannot be deported rapists to Iran. For some, it feels like petting. Or worse, a typical example of the left-leaning establishment’s perverse love for blattar (hello, Sweden Democrats in general). In the very worst case, as part of the well-known Judeo-communist conspiracy which consists of bringing in so many Muslims in Sweden that they can conquer political power and introduce a caliphate and Sharia law (hello, Richard Jomshof!).
But the reason why we cannot deport rapists to Iran is actually much simpler. Sweden, like most democratic countries on earth, has signed international conventions not to deport people to dictatorships that practice torture and the death penalty.
This is because we are against torture and the death penalty. Well, when I write “we”, of course it does not apply to all Sweden Democrats. Not even all Christian Democrats, as party leader Ebba Busch was outraged this year that the police did not kill a number of Muslims during the Koran-burning riots (“why didn’t the police shoot sharp?”).
However, we still have political majority in Sweden against torture and the death penalty. And that’s why we don’t deport even the worst violent criminals to Iran, one of the world’s worst violent dictatorships. Already this year, the regime there may have murdered upwards of 15,000 protesters. The number is uncertain due to censorship and the fact that Iran has shut down all communication over the internet.
What we can, however, deport to Iran, after the Tidö government‘s election win in 2022, are law-abiding Iranians who are well integrated in Sweden, work, pay taxes, study, speak Swedish and maybe even were born here, people who keep the Swedish healthcare system running.
As, for example, the medical couple Kazemipour. Yes, that is, they were highly qualified specialist doctors in Iran, but after fleeing to Sweden, the spouses worked as assistant nurses at Södersjukhuset in Stockholm. They have children born in Sweden.
The expulsion decision struck down like a bomb at Södersjukhuset. The co-workers among doctors and nurses demonstrated outside the main entrance against what was seen as an as incomprehensible as inhumane decision. But as you know, that kind of protestors only meet with contempt and sometimes abuse from our current government.
The deportation decision against the Kurdish journalist Lavan Muhammadi, who works at the Kurdish television station Aryen in Stockholm as a news anchor or presenter, seems equally incomprehensible and inhumane. According to the Iranian regime, he is of course considered a traitor and an Israeli agent. And given his job just as obviously identified. Those who made deportation decisions in his case know without a doubt that he will be executed if he is sent to Iran.
Ayla belongs to the new category of teenage expulsions” sizes=”(min-width: 1300px) 662px, (min-width: 1180px) 50vw, (min-width: 768px) 65vw, 100vw” loading=”eager” fetchpriority=”high” style=”aspect-ratio:1900 / 1628″/>Another example among too many. Ayla is a young woman who graduated with such high grades that she can choose to continue her education as a doctor or at the Royal Institute of Technology, but has not decided and is currently working in an LSS residence. She must be deported to Iran because she has turned 18 and is no longer counted as a child and family member but as a single adult.
She therefore belongs to the new category of teenage deportations, children who have turned 18. The fact that she has demonstrated against the regime in Iran and is co-author of an obviously regime-critical anthology, “We will never forgive”, naturally means that in Iran she is regarded as a traitor, an Israeli agent and so on. But that doesn’t save her, as if she had been a rapist. The Swedish Migration Agency makes the assessment that her political crimes are probably unknown in Iran and that her 18th birthday weighs more heavily in the decision to deport her. Like her younger siblings, they will be singled out for deportation when they too turn 18.
The hell that befell a large number of law-abiding immigrants of a certain type (not hard to guess which type) since the SD got its law changes through is described with icy clarity by one of the victims, Fereshteh Javani in Dagens Arena, clearer and better than I can articulate it:
“We are 4,700 established residents who believed in the Swedish rules. We have worked, paid taxes, learned the language, followed the law, sent our children to school, built homes, put down roots in Sweden. Now our lives are being torn apart. But who is throwing us out of our homes? Do you really think that Sweden will be a better country without us?
We are your neighbors. We are the nurse who takes care of your parents, the bus driver, the car mechanic, the preschool teacher (…) and we are the colleague who works every day to keep Sweden safe and functioning. Our hearts have clapped for a future here. And now you throw us out.”
Fereshteh Javani’s key question is the very foundation: “Do you think Sweden will be better without us?”
No sane person think so. Chaos in healthcare is just one of the obvious consequences. And on top of that the completely crazy situation that even if Sweden has to keep serious violent criminals, we can at least throw out working and law-abiding people.
Those who believe that Sweden will get better with these changes to the law are the SD, Ebba Busch and possibly the unshaven migration minister (M).
But what do they actually believe ideologically? The answer is as nasty as it is simple. It’s called ethnic cleansing.
