CDK4/6 Inhibitors & Breast Cancer: Early vs. Deferred Use | ctDNA Analysis

by Archynetys Health Desk
  • Finn, R. S. et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 3751925–1936 (2016).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Hortobagyi, G. N. et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 291541–1547 (2018).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Johnston, S. et al. MONARCH 3 final PFS: a randomized study of abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. npj Breast Cancer 55 (2019).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Tripathy, D. et al. Ribociclib plus endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, advanced breast cancer (MONALEESA-7): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 19904–915 (2018).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Cristofanilli, M. et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 17425–439 (2016).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Slamon, D. J. et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J. Clin. Oncol. 362465–2472 (2018).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Sledge, G. W. Jr. et al. MONARCH 2: abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2 advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 352875–2884 (2017).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Sledge, G. W. Jr. et al. The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2 negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy—MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 6116–124 (2020).

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Hortobgy, GN et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus letrozole in advanced breakd breaker cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 386942–950 (2022).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Slamon, D. J. et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 382514–524 (2020).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Lu, Y. S. et al. Updated overall survival of ribociclib plus endocrine therapy versus endocrine therapy alone in pre- and perimenopausal patients with HR+/HER2 advanced breast cancer in MONALEESA-7: a phase III randomized clinical trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 28851–859 (2022).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • van Ommen-Nijhof, A. et al. Selecting the optimal position of CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer—the SONIA study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 181146 (2018).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Sonke, G. S. et al. Early versus deferred use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in advanced breast cancer. Nature 636474–480 (2024).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Wang, R. et al. Early evaluation of circulating tumor DNA as marker of therapeutic efficacy and prognosis in breast cancer patients during primary systemic therapy. Breast 76103738 (2024).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Abbosh, C. et al. Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution. Nature 545446–451 (2017).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Belic, J. et al. Rapid identification of plasma DNA samples with increased ctDNA levels by a modified FAST-SeqS approach. Clin. Chem. 61838–849 (2015).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Verschoor, N. et al. Tumor-agnostic ctDNA levels by mFAST-SeqS in first-line HR-positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer patients as a biomarker for survival. npj Breast Cancer 961 (2023).

  • Mendelaar, P. A. J. et al. Genome-wide aneuploidy detected by mFast-SeqS in circulating cell-free DNA is associated with poor response to pembrolizumab in patients with advanced urothelial cancer. Mol. Oncol. 162086–2097 (2022).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Isebia, K. T. et al. mFast-SeqS-based aneuploidy score in circulating cell-free DNA is a prognostic biomarker in prostate cancer. Mol. Oncol. 171898–1907 (2023).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Reichert, Z. R. et al. Prognostic value of plasma circulating tumor DNA fraction across four common cancer types: a real-world outcomes study. Ann. Oncol. 34111–120 (2023).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Di Leo, A. et al. Prognostic characteristics in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer and characterization of abemaciclib efficacy. npj Breast Cancer 441 (2018).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Robertson, J. F. R. et al. Meta-analyses of visceral versus non-visceral metastatic hormone receptor-positive breast cancer treated by endocrine monotherapies. npj Breast Cancer 711 (2021).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Heidary, M. et al. The dynamic range of circulating tumor DNA in metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 16421 (2014).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Liu, B. et al. The circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) alteration level predicts therapeutic response in metastatic breast cancer: novel prognostic indexes based on ctDNA. Breast 65116–123 (2022).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Stover, D. G. et al. Association of cell-free DNA tumor fraction and somatic copy number alterations with survival in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 36543–553 (2018).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Walter, C. B. et al. Characteristics and prognosis of patients with primary metastatic disease vs. recurrent HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. Breast 80104412 (2025).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • de Maar, J. S. et al. Comparison between de novo and metachronous metastatic breast cancer: the presence of a primary tumour is not the only difference—a Dutch population-based study from 2008 to 2018. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 198253–264 (2023).

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Pernas, S., Tolaney, S. M., Winer, E. P. & Goel, S. CDK4/6 inhibition in breast cancer: current practice and future directions. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 101758835918786451 (2018).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Guo, L. et al. Breast cancer heterogeneity and its implication in personalized precision therapy. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 123 (2023).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Santonja, A. et al. Comparison of tumor-informed and tumor-naive sequencing assays for ctDNA detection in breast cancer. Embo mol. With. 15e16505 (2023).

    CAS
    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Klocker, E. V. et al. Clinical applications of next-generation sequencing-based ctDNA analyses in breast cancer: defining treatment targets and dynamic changes during disease progression. Mol. Oncol. 191897–1917 (2025).

    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • van Dessel, L. F. et al. Application of circulating tumor DNA in prospective clinical oncology trials—standardization of preanalytical conditions. Mol. Oncol. 11295–304 (2017).

    PubMed
    PubMed Central

    Google Scholar

  • Eisenhauer, E. A. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). EUR. J. Cancer 45228–247 (2009).

    CAS
    PubMed

    Google Scholar

  • Related Posts

    Leave a Comment