For many farmers this means waterlogged meadows, loss of yields, undermined embankments and damage to paths and drainage. The situation is particularly tense in Natura 2000 areas, where interventions are severely restricted. Many people feel a contradiction here: areas are considered ecological priority zones and CO₂ storage, but are hardly manageable due to beaver abundance.
The permitted removal of 148 animals is an important step, but for many it is only a beginning. Inventories and damage are increasing, but bureaucratic hurdles remain. What is needed is unbureaucratic compensation, compensation for infrastructure damage and an objective debate about adjustments in management. Species protection is important – but it must work with the people who maintain the cultural landscape.
