Spring in college football traditionally signals the arrival of iconic firecracker events where fans gather to witness rising stars and get a glimpse into the upcoming season. However, new challenges and considerations are leading many programs to reevaluate their annual spring games, heralding a shift in a beloved tradition.

Texas Abandons the Orange & White Scrimmage

Recently, Texas announced its decision to eliminate the Orange & White scrimmage, joining a growing list of major programs making significant changes. Head coach Steve Sarkisian cited the wear and tear on players from a grueling two-season schedule and the need to prioritize player development, especially with the influx of young, midyear recruits.

“We’re not going to have a spring game,” Sarkisian said in an interview with Kay Adams on the “Up & Adams Show.” “It’s time to find a new way to develop players and preserve their bodies amid longer schedules.”

Ohio State and Nebraska Join the Movement

Ohio State, which recently defeated Texas in the College Football Playoff semifinal, will also transform its season with a spring showcase rather than the traditional scrimmage. Coach Ryan Day echoed Sarkisian’s concerns about the toll of extended seasons.

Meanwhile, Nebraska’s departure stems from a desire to safeguard its players from the scrutiny of rival programs, especially those with the ability to influence NIL (Name, Image, and Likelihood) earnings. “We don’t want to make it easier for other programs to evaluate and poach our players,” expressed new head coach Matt Rhule.

The Commitment to Change Grows

The trend extends beyond these programs. Southern California is reportedly reconsidering its spring game plans, reflecting a broader shift in coaches’ priorities.

This winter, roughly half of the Power Five schools had disclosed plans for spring games, with varying formats that range from traditional games to skills competitions and fan engagement events.

Notre Dame and Alabama Hold Firm

However, not all schools are abandoning the tradition. Notably, national runner-up Notre Dame and powerhouse Alabama have committed to maintaining their spring scrimmages along with Florida, LSU, Michigan, Oklahoma, Oregon, and Tennessee.

“I’m either going to have coaches tampering with my players or I’m going to have a fan base that’s pissed off we don’t have a spring game,” Florida coach Billy Napier stated, underscoring the challenge coaches face in balancing fan expectations with player care.

A Tradition Evolves

The concept of spring football practices originated in 1889 at Harvard, where drills were led by captain Arthur Cumnock. It wasn’t until 1925 that the University of Michigan Established the first public spring game. By the 1990s, spring football had blossomed into a major revenue generator and fan attraction for some programs.

Yet, as seasons grew longer and player protection became more paramount, changes gradually emerged. Some schools now hold practices behind closed doors or transform their end-of-spring events into alumni games, fan festivals, or exclusive access for high donors.

Moving Beyond Controversy

As traditional spring games continue to face scrutiny, the conversation shifts toward finding new ways to keep players healthy while engaging fans. With television networks and streaming services increasing their college football coverage, new opportunities for fan engagement may emerge.

TV rights and financial incentives play a role too. The cancellation of Texas’s game, for instance, may create a gap in the SEC Network’s broadcast schedule. But, adaptability and innovation could position these schools as leaders in the evolving landscape of college sports.

Where does it Go from Here?

The future of spring football remains uncertain but promising. As schools grapple with balancing player safety and fan expectations, new traditions are likely to form. Coaches and administrators must find a path forward that respects the integrity of the game, cares for their players, and captivates their supporters.

Ultimately, the goal must be a balanced approach that ensures the longevity and prosperity of college football.