President Trump’s recent decision to impose substantial tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China includes a lesser-known but noteworthy adjustment to trade laws that impacts online shopping in the United States.
One key part of the president’s executive order could lead to higher costs for over 80 percent of US e-commerce imports. This move could reshape the online sales landscape, particularly affecting Chinese retailers like Shein and Temu, known for selling budget-friendly items to American consumers.
The order eliminates a long-standing provision, the de minimis exception, which allowed some imports to bypass tariffs if they did not exceed a certain value per package. Its removal is expected to significantly increase costs for these e-commerce giants.
Traditionally, the de minimis exception was intended for very small shipments that were not worth customs’ time. However, it has been widely exploited by companies like Shein and Temu, which ship millions of low-value items directly to US consumers.
Critics argue that this loophole has contributed to the growing drug crisis in the US. Importers using de minimis often do not provide extensive documentation to US Customs and Border Protection, facilitating the clandestine entry of drugs and their precursor chemicals into the country.
Data from the Congressional Research Service shows a dramatic surge in Chinese low-value exports. In 2023, these shipments totaled $66 billion, up from $5.3 billion in 2018. China accounts for about two-thirds of such import packages, more than all other countries combined.
The move to end de minimis exemptions has caused tension between online retailers and traditional brick-and-mortar stores. Walmart and Amazon have struggled with increased pressure to emulate Chinese companies’ shipping methods, which would potentially result in fewer jobs in US distribution centers.
Express delivery firms like FedEx and UPS have expressed reservations about losing this provision, which facilitates the transport of packages from China to the US.
From the White House perspective, eliminating de minimis exemptions is pivotal for revenue collection and improved drug surveillance. Customs officials must inspect all these packages, which were previously exempt from tariffs and detailed documentation.
Recent letters to President Trump from law enforcement groups have emphasized the provision’s role in facilitating the illicit importation of fentanyl and other drugs.
Congressional initiatives and previous proposals by the Biden administration aim to limit, but not entirely abolish, the de minimis exemption. These efforts have focused on preserving a $800 threshold for travelers’ personal belongings to avoid customs declarations and duties.
However, Trump’s executive orders do not differentiate between business and personal import values. This could lead to significant inconveniences for travelers from Canada, Mexico, and China starting October 2024.
Timothy C. Brightbill, a lawyer at Wiley Rein, suggests that ending the de minimis loophole aligns with Trump’s objectives of countering the fentanyl trade and ensuring fair competition for domestic industries.
China’s response to the new US tariffs remains silent, while US businesses are already feeling the impact of changing trade dynamics.
The elimination of the de minimis exception will have a direct economic impact on American consumers, who will face increased prices on imported goods.
A study by researchers at the National Bureau of Economic Research indicates that eliminating this exemption could cost US consumers between $11 billion and $13 billion annually. This burden would disproportionately affect low-income and minority families.
Jim Marcum, CEO of David’s Bridal, believes that ending de minimis exemptions will level the playing field between domestic retailers and international competitors. “Lowering our competitors’ tariff advantage is good for American companies and the economy,” Marcum stated.
This change will also result in a more accurate representation of US trade with China and the global trade deficit. Currently, trade data excludes de minimis shipments, artificially deflating import figures.
Brad W. Setser, an economist at the Council on Foreign Relations, predicts that the trade figures could increase by up to $100 billion. “This change will bring what was previously considered shadow trade into the open, giving a clearer picture of international trade activity,” Setser explained.
The implications of this decision are far-reaching, affecting businesses, consumers, and law enforcement. While larger retailers and domestic producers might see increased profitability, the economic shift could present challenges for many Americans, particularly those with limited financial resources.
As customs officials adapt to the new regulations, questions remain about how effectively they can enforce tariffs on a massive scale of low-value imports.
The decision underscores the complex interplay between trade policies, economic interests, and public health. As businesses and consumers brace for the changes, the effectiveness of these new policies in addressing both the trade imbalance and drug trafficking efforts remains to be seen.
For businesses, the removal of de minimis exemptions means more predictable tariff costs. However, the transition may prove challenging as supply chains adjust to these new regulations.
Consumers will experience increased costs on imported items, particularly from China. Smaller retailers and those focusing on ethical supply chains will have an opportunity to compete more evenly with large international brands.
“This leveling of the playing field is crucial for sustainable business development in the US,” Marcum emphasized. “It ensures that all companies operate under fair conditions, which benefits the broader economy in the long term.”
Ultimately, the Trump administration’s decision signals a significant shift in how imports are taxed and regulated. While it aims to rectify economic and health issues, it will require careful implementation to avoid unintended consequences.
Stay informed about these developments and their impacts on your finances and your community.
We encourage you to share your thoughts and experiences regarding these changes. Join the discussion below, subscribe to our newsletter, or share this article on social media to stay updated and engaged on the latest trade policy issues.