Documentarian Alex Gibney on the power and influence of Elon Musk

The film follows the billionaire’s rise, his ventures and the ways he has leveraged information to expand his reach, presenting a comprehensive portrait that aims to answer how much one person can dominate multiple industries. Its four‑hour runtime suggests an in‑depth approach, positioning the work as a definitive look at one of the era’s most polarizing figures. Yahoo and The Telegraph describe the reviews as “damning” and a “chillingly forensic hatchet job,” while The New York Times calls the four‑hour film a weigh‑in on whether Musk is “too much.” Variety’s teaser frames the billionaire as either the ‘greatest living inventor’ or a ‘fascist’ who ‘has lost his mind.’ The Independent rejects the genius label, and Newser notes Musk’s use of information to accumulate power.

Deadline and AP News highlight the documentary’s focus on his influence. The stark language used by several outlets signals a highly critical tone, yet the film’s forensic style suggests extensive research rather than pure polemic. The New York Times and Variety frame the work as a probing inquiry, while The Telegraph’s description of a “hatchet job” hints at editorial bias.

This tension indicates that viewers may encounter a narrative that both documents and judges Musk’s actions, leaving room for debate about objectivity. Monitoring announcements from streaming platforms and festival line‑ups will reveal the exact premiere date. Audience reception and subsequent commentary from the outlets that have previewed the film will shape the ongoing conversation about Musk’s impact.