Andrew Tate exaggerates and did not own supercars in photos, his lawyers say

The lawyers asserted the vehicles were rented solely to create a richer online appearance. The timing coincides with renewed scrutiny of Tate’s online brand, prompting legal counsel to clarify the source of the vehicles. Forbes detailed the arrangement, stating that a yacht and several high‑performance cars were hired to project affluence.

The Daily Beast described the brothers as being forced to make an embarrassing wealth admission, while AOL.com noted the lawyers argued the online persona was misleading. Yahoo News UK and its Canadian counterpart carried the same claim, emphasizing that the displayed assets were rented. Across these outlets, the consistent theme is that the ostentatious visuals were staged rather than reflective of genuine ownership.

The lawyers contend that the curated image constitutes a misleading wealth persona, but coverage does not disclose whether other possessions were similarly fabricated or reveal the cost or duration of the rentals. No financial figures or broader investigative findings have been released, leaving the full scale of the misrepresentation undefined. Future reporting may clarify if additional assets or marketing strategies were employed.