The Taipei District Court today (20) opposed Yongfengyu (1907-TW) Several colleagues were involved in a case involving the purchase of exchangeable corporate bonds issued by Giant Crystal by its subsidiary, Yongfeng Yu Global, in violation of the Securities Exchange Law. In the first instance, some of the colleagues involved were found guilty. In this regard, Yongfeng Yu stated that this investment case earned 3.89 million for Yongfeng Yu Investment ControlUSDThe benefit of the investment is a successful and lucrative investment case, not a fraud case.
Today’s first instance verdict that several of Yongfeng’s colleagues were involved in a case involving the purchase of exchangeable corporate bonds issued by Giant Crystal by its subsidiary, Yongfeng Yu Global, in violation of the Securities Exchange Law. In this regard, Yongfeng Yu said that he firmly believes that the colleagues are innocent, to the point of incomprehension and regret, pending receipt of the judgment Later, the second instance will be discussed and discussed with lawyers.
Yongfeng Yu said that the investment case was based on the purpose of profiting Yongfeng Yu Group, and why Shouchuan introduced favorable investment opportunities to Yongfeng Yu Investment Control. After the then chairman of Yongfeng Yu Investment Control Qiu Xiuying instructed colleagues in relevant departments to evaluate that it was worthy of investment, but because it had to go through Only when the original joint venture shareholders exercise the preemptive right to purchase old stocks, will they use equity investment as the main purpose, supplemented by long-term lease rights as a guarantee for investment.
In the entire investment case, Qiu Xiuying, the former chairman of Yongfeng Yu Investment Holdings, and other colleagues involved in the case, invested 8.5 million in decisions and suggestions for the company’s interests within the scope of their own rights and responsibilities.USDLater, earned 3.89 million for Yongfeng Yu Investment ControlUSDThis benefit creates profits for the company and shareholders, and makes business judgments and decisions that are beneficial to the company. It is a successful and profitable investment case, not a bad case.
Yongfengyu emphasized that the actions of the relevant personnel involved in the lawsuit in this case are based on the consideration of the interests of the company and shareholders, and they are based on the concept of diligence and conscientiousness, upholding the principles of seriousness, law-abiding, and law-abiding, without any crime. After receiving the judgment, the relevant colleagues will discuss the appeal with the lawyer, and the company will also assist the colleagues to fight for their own rights.