Starbucks’ Strict New Office Attendancy Policy: What to Expect

Starbucks is implementing a new policy that will require corporate staff to come to the office three days a week. This move follows a memo sent to one of the company’s divisions that threatens "separation" for those who fail to adhere to the policy.

Enforce Your Attention, Even Forgoing Vacation and Sick Days

The memo announced Starbucks’ intent to hold workers accountable for their return-to-office attendance. This apply to roughly 3,500 corporate staff, excluding vacation, sick time, and business travel.

The Policy’s Fine Print: Exclusions and Exemptions

Starbucks noted that workers can request an exemption from the mandate due to physical, mental, sensory impairment, or another disability. Despite this, the enforced standard could result in firings for non-compliance.

A Regime Shift: From Flexibility to Enforcement

Brian Niccol, Starbucks’ CEO, signaled the company’s shift away from the carrot of flexibility towards the stick of enforced attendance. This policy transition is part of a broader trend observed at large corporations in the ongoing return-to-office battle.

Consequences and Pushback

Many companies, including Amazon and Dell, have adopted similar measures to maintain office presence. However, pushback from workers has been significant, including broad oppositions like Starbucks’ 2023 protests from corporate staff.

Voluntary Turnover Hope

Some firms hope the anxiety around enforcement will drive voluntary turnover, according to a survey from BambooHR. This approach is contentious, as many experienced staffers may quit due to stringent office mandates.

CEO’s Remote Work Disparity?

The implementation of Niccol’s remote work allowance while requiring strict in-office attendance from other corporate staff may face backlash. The CEO’s work arrangement is particularly contentious, with staff countering that his location should not influence in-office requirements.

A Reduction in Working Hours: The Change Ahead

Starbucks dropped requiring Tuesday as a common attendance day at headquarters, instead setting expectations on a team level. This change is expected to reflect new workers’ needs and demands.

The Path Ahead: Adapt or Resign

Many corporate employees face a conundrum: adapt to the new policy, risking their work-life balance, or risk severance due to noncompliance. The localized enforcement trend is one of curiosity and concern, especially for mid-level to high-level staff.

Time to Decide: What Are Your Ideas?

Do you think this stricter attendance policy will be beneficial or problematic for corporation employees? How do you think companies should balance office attendance and flexibility given current circumstances. Share your thoughts!

Do you have thoughts on this new policy? Join the conversation below to voice your opinions.