Following Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi’s assertions in the Lok Sabha, External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has issued a statement clarifying the purpose and details of his recent trip to the United States. Jaishankar’s post on social media platform X addresses misconceptions raised by the Congress leader.

Jaishankar’s Clarification

“Leader of Opposition Rahul Gandhi deliberately spoke a falsehood about my visit to the US in December 2024. I went to meet the Secretary of State and NSA of the Biden Administration,” stated Jaishankar. He further explained that the primary reason for his visit was to chair a gathering of Consuls General and highlighted that the incoming NSA-designate also met with him.

No Invitation for PM Modi

While addressing Gandhi’s claims, Jaishankar made it clear that at no point during his visit was there any discussion regarding an invitation for Prime Minister Narendra Modi to attend Donald Trump’s inauguration. “It is common knowledge that the Prime Minister does not attend such events,” Jaishankar emphasized. He added that India generally delegates such invitations to Special Envoys.

The Impact of Misinformation

“Rahul Gandhi’s lies may be intended politically. But they damage the nation abroad,” Jaishankar warned. His statement underscores the importance of accurate information in international diplomacy, highlighting how political rhetoric can inadvertently harm national interests.

The Broader Implications

This incident reflects the complex dynamics of Indian politics and international relations. It serves as a reminder of the need for transparency and sincerity in diplomatic communications. The fallout from such statements not only affects political relationships but can also have broader implications for India’s foreign policy and its positioning in the global arena.

Conclusion

Jaishankar’s robust response to Rahul Gandhi’s claims underscores the responsibilities of all political leaders in maintaining accurate information and avoiding misinformation. As this issue continues to unfold, it will be crucial to watch how the diplomatic community and public opinion respond.