Ozempic: Miracle Drug or Performance Enhancer? Unveiling the Controversy
Who doesn’t love a quick fix in life? Sarah McInerney, host of RTÉ’s Drivetime, expressed this sentiment during a recent discussion about Ozempic. Her enthusiasm was palpable as she referred to it as a “miracle drug” that seems to address a myriad of issues.
The Miracle Drug: Ozempic’s Prolific Benefits
McInerney’s opinion is not isolated; a recent study by the American Medical Association has provided evidence supporting her claim. The study highlighted that semaglutide, the active ingredient in Ozempic and Wegovy, significantly reduced alcohol cravings in participants with alcohol-use disorder. After two months, patients on semaglutide drank nearly 30% less alcohol compared to those on a placebo.
Beyond alcohol addiction, there is anecdotal evidence suggesting that Ozempic can also combat cravings for nicotine and cocaine. Additionally, it reduces the risk of strokes and heart attacks, potentially offering multiple benefits in one drug.
Health Risks and Ethical Concerns
However, the “miracle” comes with a caveat. Semaglutide can have potential side effects, including an increased risk of thyroid tumors and vision loss. These health risks must be weighed against the benefits.
The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) is closely monitoring Ozempic’s use, recognizing its potential as a performance enhancer. In sports, maintaining fairness and protecting athletes’ health are paramount. WADA has banned several weight-control medications in the past, like stimulants and diuretics, and has added 2,4-Dinitrophenol (DNP) and Rev-Erb-a agonists.
WADA’s Watchlist and Considerations
Currently, WADA has placed Ozempic on its watchlist for potential performance-enhancing use. To ban a substance, it must meet at least two of three criteria: enhanced performance, health risk, or violation of the spirit of sport. Ozempic almost surely meets the first criterion, as improving weight-to-power ratio can enhance performance in cycling, running, and swimming.
Dr. Olivier Rabin, WADA’s senior director of medicine and science, suggests that Ozempic goes “beyond a simple drug for obesity” and raises broader societal and sporting questions. He notes that if it improves weight-to-power ratios, it could offer benefits in cycling, running, and swimming, meeting the performance enhancement criterion. Health risks and spirit of sport, however, remain ambiguous.
Banned Substances: Carbon Monoxide Inhalation
The sporting world is also addressing the use of carbon monoxide inhalation, another potential performance enhancer in cycling. Rebreathing carbon monoxide increases blood oxygen capacity, a practice that some athletes have exploited. Tour de France winner Tadej Pogacar downplayed the practice, stating that it is not akin to breathing exhaust fumes.
The Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI) has banned the repeated use of carbon monoxide inhalation on health and safety grounds. UCI chief David Lappartient emphasized the importance of athlete health and requested WADA to consider their stance.
It’s not like we’re breathing exhaust fumes from cars every day
— Tour de France winner Tadej Pogacar
While carbon monoxide inhalation poses a severe health risk, its banning underscores a broader debate about the ethics of performance enhancement in sports.
The Future of Ozempic in Sports
The future of Ozempic in sports remains uncertain. If WADA discovers it is being used beyond its intended purpose, a ban might follow. While it may prove a “miracle drug” for some, its use in sports should be scrutinized to ensure fairness and safety.
Ultimately, the decision to ban Ozempic will require careful consideration of its performance-enhancing potential, health risks, and adherence to the spirit of sportsmanship. As the debate continues, athletes, sporting bodies, and health organizations will need to navigate these complexities to protect the integrity of sports and the well-being of athletes.
What You Can Do
We invite our readers to join the conversation. Share your thoughts on the use of Ozempic and other performance-enhancing substances in sports. Do you believe athletes should be allowed to use such drugs if they improve health outcomes? Should natural enhancements be banned to maintain fairness in sports?
Join us in this important discussion. Comment below, subscribe to our newsletter for more updates, and share this article on social media to continue the conversation.