Republican Senator Martha McSally attacks a CNN journalist.

Republican Senator Martha McSally attacks a CNN journalist.

It was a direct question that was asked of almost all Republican senators in the Capitol on Thursday: Should the Senate consider new evidence as part of the political trial?

But when CNN’s Manu Raju, a respected Congress reporter, introduced him to Senator Martha McSally of Arizona, the first-term Republican who is in re-election this fall was attacked.

“You are a liberal hack,” he said. “I am not talking to you. You are a liberal hack.”

Then, Ms. McSally disappeared into the space of a Senate office without answering the question.

The exchange was notable for the generally respectful Senate, betraying how polarized American policy has become and the raw nerves surrounding political judgment.

Far from apologizing, Ms. McSally responded to Mr. Raju’s episode account on Twitter by posting a video of it. Journalists responded quickly by Mr. Raju’s long credibility record.

Pelosi addresses the idea of ​​the testimony of Lev Parnas.

Credit…Erin Schaff / The New York Times

President Nancy Pelosi said Thursday that Lev Parnas, the businessman born in the Soviet Union that He says that President Trump was fully aware of efforts to dig up harmful information that would help him in the 2020 elections, he would be “a credible witness” during the political trial, although she failed to say he should testify.

“It would be a credible witness if what he testifies relates to the issue in question: the president’s behavior,” said Pelosi about Parnas, who is under federal indictment. But she said she would let the administrators of the House prosecution determine if they want to seek her testimony.

Mr. Parnas, associate of Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, played a central role in the campaign to pressure Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Mr. Parnas is charged with criminal charges largely unrelated; In an interview with The New York Times on Wednesday night, he expressed remorse for his role in the Ukrainian pressure campaign, but blamed the president and Mr. Giuliani.

Security intensifies around the Capitol, with a more formal outfit.

Credit…Erin Schaff / The New York Times

The first sign that something unusual is happening at the Capitol on Thursday was evident at each entrance door: Capitol police officers wear their ties, mandatory clothing for political trial. On normal days, officers have the option of wearing ties, but they are also allowed to wear turtlenecks with a golden police badge under their navy blue shirts.

The ties were only a sign that the Capitol is strengthening security before the trial. Reporters, staff members and Capitol Police officers must wear badges with special color codes: brown for journalists, brown for staff members, gray for police officers, in the Senate during the trial. Chamber staff members received no badges; They have been notified that they cannot cross the Capitol to the Senate while the trial is in session.

A federal guard dog intervenes in the Ukrainian affair, saying that the Trump administration violated the law.

The Trump administration violated the law by retaining security assistance assistance to Ukraine, a nonpartisan organization The federal surveillance agency said Thursday, weighing a decision by President Trump that is at the heart of the political trial case against him.

The Government Accountability Office said the White House Administration and Budget Office withheld almost $ 400 million, which was allocated by Congress, for “a political reason” in violation of the Award Control Law. The decision was directed by the president himself, and during the political trial investigation of the House of Representatives, administration officials declared that they had expressed concern about their legality in vain.

The White House budget office rejected the conclusions of the report.

The report, by itself, does not give rise to any action, although its publication just when Mr. Trump’s impeachment trial is underway will surely feed additional questions about the impact of his actions.

The White House press secretary dismisses new evidence linking a Giuliani associate with the Ukrainian affair.

Credit…Stephanie Keith / Getty Images

The White House press secretary, Stephanie Grisham tried to rule out the flow of new emerging details about President Trump’s pressure campaign on Ukraine through Lev Parnas, an associate of the president’s personal lawyer, Rudolph W. Giuliani.

“We don’t worry too much. Once again, we know that everything in the Senate will be fair,” Grisham told Fox News on Thursday. “It is unfortunate that he is now touring the media with many of the media that are against the President. “I think that shows exactly what he is doing.”

Grisham also criticized the House of Representatives political trial procedures and said the White House hoped Trump’s formal response to the charges would prove that he did nothing wrong.

Giuliani worked with Parnas to try to expel the US ambassador to Ukraine. Mr. Parnas is under federal indictment and has been giving interviews to reporters, including cable news, while on bail.

New evidence in the Ukrainian pressure campaign looms over the trial.

Even when the trial was about to begin, lawmakers on both sides of the Capitol again waded through a treasury of text messages, voice messages, calendar entries and other records related to a campaign to pressure Ukraine to investigate Mr. Trump’s political rivals.

The evidence, delivered by Lev Parnas, adds significant new details to the public record on how the pressure campaign that supports the impeachment charges of the House was developed and who knew it. On Wednesday, Parnas also told the New York Times that he believed Trump knew that he and Rudolph W. Giuliani, the president’s personal lawyer, were working to dig up his political rivals.

House managers could try to assemble the pieces of material once the trial begins, but for now, they hoped that the vast amount of information would increase pressure on Senate Republicans to agree to call witnesses and gather new evidence. during the trial

However, it was not clear if the Republicans were so moved. A moderate key Republican, Senator Susan Collins of Maine, asked a question that Democrats do not want to hear: does it not reveal Parnas’s revelation that the House finished its investigation too hastily, leaving too many stones unturned?

The political trial procedures are transferred to the Senate. Here is a summary of the day.

Credit…Doug Mills / The New York Times

The story will be made quickly on Thursday, as the Senate begins only the third presidential political trial in US history in three hours or less. Events begin at noon and senators can be on airplanes outside the city before the end of business hours.

Here is a summary of the day’s procedures, based on the orientation of Senate officials:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *