Department of Energy will publish documents related to Ukraine

The agreement comes after American Oversight sued the Department of Energy for the documents in October under the Freedom of Information Act. The parties agreed that two additional record launches will take place on February 4 and March 16.

The court presentation says that the first set of documents will focus on the communications of then secretary Rick Perry, as well as cabinet chief Brian McCormack, among other elements. The next set will include communications with President Donald Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani.

Perry and Giuliani were key actors in the congressional political trial investigation of Trump’s conduct in Ukraine that led the House to accuse Trump of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

Democrats say Trump abused his office by running a pressure campaign for Ukraine to announce an investigation into former Vice President Joe Biden in exchange for $ 400 million in US security assistance and a White House meeting. Trump, the Democrats say, then blocked Congress investigators to cover up the misconduct.

Multiple US officials declared before Congress that Giuliani was a conduit for messages between the president and officials in Kiev, and that he was leading a problematic circumvention of typical national security processes.

The White House interim chief of staff, Mick Mulvaney, confirmed at a press conference in October that Trump had instructed Perry, at a May 23 meeting at the Oval Office, to work through Giuliani on related matters. with Ukraine
The Department of Energy did not immediately respond to CNN’s request for comments. So far, the agency has refused to cooperate with a subpoena from Congress for documents related to Ukraine requested as part of the political trial investigation.

In October, the Undersecretary of Energy, Melissa Burnison, told the three committees involved in the investigation that the Department of Energy “cannot fulfill its request for documents and communications at this time.”

In a letter, Burnison argues about the validity of the investigation and argues that the request is for confidential communications “that are potentially protected by executive privilege and would require careful review.”

Burnison concluded by saying that the department “remains committed to working with Congress.”

.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *