The Hug Heard ‘Round the Netherlands: Jinek’s Approach to Interviewing

Eva Jinek, a prominent figure in Dutch talk show television, has increasingly come under scrutiny for her demonstrative displays of affection towards her guests. This practice, most recently observed with comedian Jochem Myjer, involves Jinek embracing guests upon their arrival, a gesture some critics deem “hysterical” and perhaps undermining her journalistic integrity.

While some viewers find Jinek’s warmth endearing, others question whether such physical closeness compromises her ability to conduct critical and unbiased interviews. The debate raises questions about the evolving role of talk show hosts and the boundaries between personal connection and professional distance.

A Closer Look at the Myjer Encounter

During a recent episode,Jinek playfully acknowledged Myjer’s infrequent appearances on talk shows,stating,It is a bit like I have an exotic animal at the table,because you don’t appear in talk shows that often. This lighthearted exchange preceded the now-customary hug, further fueling the ongoing discussion about jinek’s interviewing style.

Myjer responded in kind,No,that’s right. I don’t do that often, no. But you are used to exotic animals, right? Jinek then joked about a Freek Vonk reference, showcasing the playful dynamic she often cultivates with her guests.

Critics Weigh In: Is Jinek Too “Klef”?

The chorus of disapproval regarding Jinek’s tactile approach is growing louder. Media critic Angela de Jong reportedly confronted Jinek directly after a broadcast, expressing her concerns. Similarly, TV analyst Tina Nijkamp has publicly voiced her discomfort, describing Jinek’s behavior as very hysterically towards the guests. nijkamp specifically objects to the use of diminutive terms like Lieverdje (sweetheart) and baby, arguing that they detract from the seriousness of the interviews.

I always find her very hysterically towards the guests. Lieverdje, “” baby, “I don’t have to.

Tina Nijkamp, Side Today

This criticism echoes broader concerns about the potential for bias and the blurring of lines between interviewer and interviewee. According to a recent study by the Netherlands Institute for Social Research, public trust in media objectivity has declined by 15% in the past five years, making scrutiny of interviewing techniques all the more relevant.

Echoes of the Past: Van Nieuwkerk’s Influence?

Wilfred Genee, another prominent media personality, suggests that Jinek’s approach may be inspired by the techniques of Matthijs van Nieuwkerk, known for his own distinctive interviewing style. Genee observes a pattern of excessive praise and familiarity, citing examples involving Reinout Oerlemans and Sander Schimmelpenninck.

I think she has taken over the technique of what Matthijs van Nieuwkerk did. Opposing someone terribly… Really wholly cuddling and calling so far into it and shouting ‘fantastic’ all the time.

Wilfred Genee

Albert Verlinde supports this view, characterizing jinek’s behavior as cuddling. The comparison to Van Nieuwkerk raises questions about the evolution of talk show formats and the pressure to create engaging television, even at the expense of journalistic rigor.

The Diminutive Debate Continues

Tina Nijkamp further elaborates on her critique, highlighting Jinek’s use of diminutive words as especially problematic. She cites the example of Gert Verhulst, whom Jinek reportedly “adored,” arguing that such effusive praise prevents a more balanced and critical assessment. Nijkamp concludes, Anyway, giggling is not necessary from me.

The debate surrounding Jinek’s interviewing style underscores the complex relationship between personality, professionalism, and public perception in the world of television journalism. As Jinek continues to embrace her guests, the discussion about the appropriateness and effectiveness of her approach is likely to persist.