The owner of a Staffordshire bull terrier stood in a group of protesters with his puppy, devoid of a muzzle or approved collar, as he ran absent from a law enforcement officer who questioned him for his address.
At Cork Magistrates’ Court, David Crean, 41, of 1 Meadow Travel, Hollyhill, Cork, pleaded guilty to a single charge of boycotting Garda Gheorghe Rosu and the 1986 Puppy Management Act. two offenses below the Act.
Sergeant Gearóid Davis mentioned: “On September 17, 2022 at 3:30 pm, during a protest on the Grand Parade, Garda Rosu noticed standing in the crowd of a man, whom he now refers to as David Crean, who held a pet.
“Garda Rosu identified the dog’s breed as a Staffordshire Bull Terrier, a controlled breed beneath the Dog Manage Act 1986.
“The canine was grownup size, black and was not wearing a collar. Mr Crean verified the puppy was his.
“When asked if he was informed that canine of this breed experienced to don muzzles in public and were being expected to have an identification tag with the owner’s identify and address on the collar, he replied that the muzzle was in his motor vehicle.
“Inspite of quite a few requests, he has not provided an handle. When Garda Rosu started out arresting him, he fled and was arrested not far away.”
Crean admitted failing to place the pet on a basic safety muzzle, failing to place the pet dog on a collar with the owner’s name and tackle on it, and resisting police.
Decide Alec Gabbett fined Crean €200 at the gunpoint and thought of the collar charge.
Responding to law enforcement resistance, the judge said: “I do not know what happened there.”
He also took this allegation into consideration.
Decide Garbett clarified that the doggy did not have a collar. Law firm Diarmuid Kelleher mentioned it was incorrect that the pet dog did not have a collar. He explained the dog had a leash and a collar, but the collar did not consist of all the information expected by the Puppy Management Act. He said the pet now has the accurate collar and is mostly “an indoor canine”.
Decide Garbett said: “At this place I am extremely aware of the tremendous amount of publicity that has been affiliated with these canine. Sadly, serious damage could have been triggered. They could be perilous. I’m not indicating this doggy is specially dangerous.”