Argentine neuropsychiatrist Gabriel de Erausquin said in an interview for Infobae live that the Sars-Cov-2 virus did not arise naturally, but it was artificially created at the Wuhan Virology Institute in China.As indicated, the evidence of molecular biology, viral genetics and epidemiological behavior that support this statement were already available in 2021.
“The virus is definitely artificial, I have no doubt”, Said De Erausquin. He explained that the SARS-COV-2 is“ a chimera ”,that is,a combination of elements of different viruses,whose genetic structure has no known natural relatives.“ ”It is indeed not a virus that has natural behavior. A natural guest for this virus was never found before the human”He stressed.
“It is not a virus that had any natural relative, that is, none of the bat viruses or other animals in China with which it was linked to it have any direct relationship with this virus,” he said.
The specialist stressed that the subsidies that allowed the creation of the virus came from the National Institute of Infectious Diseases of the United states (CDC), which allocated $ 600,000 to the Wuhan Virology Institute. This information, he said, is documented and is of public access. “we certainly know exactly how much money was assigned, through who arrived at the institute and what was the purpose: Function gain research to humanize virus and produce vaccines”He said.
“This virus is what is called a chimera, that is, that combines critical elements in its structure of different viruses and that happens naturally is weird. There is no evidence that this has happened naturallyas a natural guest for this virus was never found before the human, “he added.
Table of Contents
The contentious Debate Over COVID-19’s Genesis
The debate surrounding the origins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to spark intense discussion within the scientific community. While the prevailing narrative suggests a natural zoonotic spillover, alternative theories, including the possibility of laboratory manipulation, persist. Thes theories have gained traction, fueled by independent research and expert opinions that challenge the conventional understanding.
Early Warnings and Scientific Scrutiny
notably, early concerns were voiced by Chinese virologist Li Meng Yan, who published research in Shanghai detailing unique structural characteristics of the virus protein. Her findings suggested potential artificial manipulation. Facing alleged threats, she sought refuge in California. Her claims, along with other research, have fueled the debate about the virus’s origin.
adding to the complexity, in 2020, separate investigations by research teams in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom independently arrived at similar conclusions. Their analyses pointed towards genetic features in the SARS-CoV-2 virus that were arduous to reconcile with natural evolutionary processes. These findings, while debated, contribute to the ongoing scrutiny of the virus’s origins.
The “Escaped Vaccine” hypothesis
One hypothesis suggests a potential scenario where Chinese researchers were attempting to develop a humanized virus for vaccine creation, but the virus inadvertently escaped the laboratory. This theory also raises concerns about the biosafety protocols at the Wuhan institute of Virology, which have been described as inadequate.
I think the Chinese tried to develop a humanized virus to make a vaccine and escaped them
Long COVID and Neurodegenerative Links
Beyond the immediate impact of COVID-19, researchers are increasingly focused on the long-term neurological consequences, often referred to as Long COVID. Studies are exploring potential links between Long COVID and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s. Emerging evidence suggests that some individuals may have a genetic predisposition that makes them more susceptible to prolonged symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection, potentially accelerating the onset of Alzheimer’s disease.
Common cognitive symptoms observed in Long COVID patients include persistent loss of smell (anosmia), short-term memory deficits, difficulties with organization, and word-finding problems. These symptoms have been observed to be significantly more prevalent in individuals aged 60 to 70 without prior cognitive impairment.
International Research Efforts
The examination into the neuropsychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 has spurred international collaboration. An early meeting organized by the World health Organization (WHO) in New Delhi led to the formation of the Alzheimer’s Association Consortium on the Neuropsychiatric Sequelae of Sars-COV-2 (CNS SARS-COV-2). This consortium continues to conduct international studies to better understand the long-term neurological impacts of the virus.
320′); fbq(‘track’, ‘PageView’); fbq(‘track’, ‘ViewContent’);
