Comelec rejects the movement towards the extended deadline for Marcos’ response on the DQ situation

MANILA, Philippines – The next division of the Electoral Commission (Comelec) has rejected the movement to revoke the purchase to increase the time period granted to former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. to react to the petition inquiring for the cancellation of his candidacy to the presidency.

In its final decision promulgated on Tuesday but created readily available to the media on Thursday, the Next Division noted that Comelec “has the authority to suspend the regulatory time period delivered for by the regulations in the interest of justice and the rapid resolution of instances before it”.

“By virtue of this authority, the Fee is equally empowered to offer with all conditions with no stressing about procedural subtleties that do not square with the need to render justice, in any circumstance without the need of even more squander of time, without the need of prejudice to the suitable of the events to a full working day in court docket is not significantly compromised, “the determination reads.

'Penalty lang': Marcos camp insists that it is not necessary to declare the tax case in COC

Previous Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. documents his candidacy certification (COC) for the presidency on Oct 6, 2021, at the Sofitel Harbor Backyard tent in Pasay Metropolis. (INQUIRER.internet/Daniza Fernandez)

“In consideration of the foregoing, the Fee (2nd Division) hereby decides to reject the petition for review presented by the applicants”, reads the selection.

On 18 November, the Second Division of Comelec recognized Marcos’ charm for a even further 5 times starting on 17 November to current his reply to the instance requesting the cancellation of his candidacy certificate.

See also  The regional governor was preparing Russia to receive the Monument to the Soviet Army - Bulgaria

The deadline for the Marcos camp to answer to the request submitted on November 2 was initially November 16, as indicated in the summons issued by Comelec.

The applicants, nevertheless, cited part 4, paragraph 6, of short article 23 of the Comelec Policies of Course of action, as amended by Comelec resolution no. 9523, which does not supply for any extension of the deadline for submitting a response.

The petitioners further stated that the Comelec get of 18 November did not lengthen anything at all as the deadline for publishing a confirmed reaction had already expired on 16 November.

But in its latest selection, Comelec said that underneath area 4, rule 1 of Comelec’s 1993 policies of process, the Fee has the ability to suspend its individual policies.

The aforementioned area states that: “In the desire of justice and in get to get a immediate settlement of all matters pending right before the Commission, this Regulation or part of it may possibly be suspended by the Fee”.

“It is well worth pointing out that a scenario is very best decided when all contending events are ready to air their respective statements, existing their arguments and adduce evidence to aid them. The events as a result have the option to be heard totally and the needs of because of approach are fulfilled, “claimed the Second Division.

“Without a doubt, in performing exercises its energy to suspend its rule pursuant to the provisions of Report 1, Part 4 of the Comelec Procedures of Method, in the interest of justice and the relevance of the case in dilemma, the Commission (Second Division ) believes it is suitable to permit both equally events to be heard. So the fast movement is denied, “additional the division.

See also  "Cepa Bellavista": Hundreds of young people gathered in a massive "party" despite the risk of contagion | National

Indicator up for our every day publication

Read through Up coming

Really don’t overlook the most current information and facts.

Subscribe to INQUIRER As well as to access The Philippine Each day Inquirer and 70+ other titles, share up to 5 devices, hear to the information, obtain as early as 4am and share posts on social media. Call 896 6000.

For responses, complaints or requests, remember to call us.

Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.