Cấu trúc lạ trên bãi cạn Scarborough ở Biển Đông đã biến mất

by Archynetys World Desk
The Ghost Structure at Scarborough Shoal

A mysterious structure suspected to be a buoy or raft appeared at Scarborough Shoal in late May 2026 before vanishing by June 1. The development occurred alongside historic joint patrols by the United States and Philippines, triggering a rapid military response from China’s Southern Theater Command on May 31.

The Ghost Structure at Scarborough Shoal

Satellite imagery captured by Vantor on May 27, 28, and 29 revealed an unidentified structure—likely a buoy or a raft—positioned at Scarborough Shoal. According to reports from Thanh Niên, images from May 27 and 29 also showed a barrier stretching across the area. The U.S.-based maritime tracking group SeaLight further identified a small, reflective object near the entrance to the shoal’s inner waters in images from May 28, suggesting the object was a fixed structure rather than a temporary optical illusion.

The Ghost Structure at Scarborough Shoal
cluster (priority): Báo Thanh Niên

The mystery was short-lived. By June 1, Vantor’s satellite photos showed the structure had completely disappeared.

“I still don’t know what it is… Sometimes, they place buoys and other things there. It could be something from outside drifting into the shoal.”

Philippine Defense Minister, via Báo Thanh Niên

While the Philippine government launched an investigation through a dedicated task force to verify the object using surveillance tools, the structure’s brief appearance served as a catalyst for heightened tension in a region already simmering with friction.

A Historic Shift in US-Philippine Naval Cooperation

The appearance of the structure coincided with a significant escalation in security cooperation between Manila and Washington. From May 26 to 30, the two nations conducted joint patrols near the shoal, marking a strategic evolution in their alliance. As detailed by Trí Thức VN, this operation was the first time a U.S. Coast Guard vessel participated in maritime activities alongside the Philippine armed forces.

A Historic Shift in US-Philippine Naval Cooperation
cluster (priority): Sputnik Việt Nam
  • USCGC Midgett (WMSL-757): U.S. Coast Guard patrol vessel.
  • BRP Antonio Luna (FFG-14): Philippine Navy frigate.
  • BRP Melchora Aquino (MRRV-9702): Philippine Coast Guard patrol vessel.

These vessels focused on maritime law enforcement training, including the boarding and inspection of suspicious ships. SeaLight noted that the patrol operated approximately 35 to 40 nautical miles from entities that China continues to “occupy and control.”

“The direct participation of the US Coast Guard in activities challenging China’s maritime aggression in the ‘West Philippine Sea’ (South China Sea) marks a historic step in the US-Philippines alliance.”

SeaLight Foundation

Beijing’s Combat Readiness Response

Beijing reacted swiftly to the joint patrols and the Philippine government’s concerns. On May 31, the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Southern Theater Command announced that naval and air units had conducted “combat readiness patrols” in the airspace and waters surrounding the shoal. According to Sputnik Việt Nam, the PLA framed these movements as effective countermeasures against “provocations and violations of rules.”

Beijing's Combat Readiness Response
cluster (priority): Trí Thức VN

Simultaneously, the China Coast Guard reported conducting law enforcement patrols in the same vicinity. They claimed to have dealt with ships engaging in “activities violating rights” since the beginning of May, though they provided no specific details on the nature of these violations.

This military posturing followed a blunt assessment from the Philippine Defense Minister during the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on May 30. Speaking to reporters, the minister asserted that the Philippines faces a “serious threat” from China, both territorially and politically, despite a perceived cooling of tensions between the U.S. and China following a mid-May summit in Beijing.

The Strategic Friction of Bajo de Masinloc

The volatility at Scarborough Shoal—referred to as “Bajo de Masinloc” by the Philippines—stems from a decade of contested control. China seized the shoal from the Philippines following a tense standoff in 2012 and has since maintained a constant presence of coast guard and maritime militia vessels. The geography underscores the disparity in proximity: the shoal sits 240 km west of the Philippine island of Luzon, but nearly 900 km from China’s Hainan island.

The Strategic Friction of Bajo de Masinloc
cluster (priority): RFI

The recent cycle of “strange structures” and joint patrols suggests a new phase of the conflict. Manila is no longer merely protesting incursions but is actively integrating U.S. law enforcement assets to challenge Beijing’s status quo. As reported by RFI, the Philippine Defense Minister stated that the country “has no other choice but to be resilient and stand up against Chinese aggression.”

The rapid disappearance of the May structure suggests it may have been a probe—a test of Philippine and U.S. reaction times and surveillance capabilities. Whether it was a drifting piece of debris or a calculated military experiment, the result was a reinforced military posture from both sides. With the U.S. Coast Guard now directly embedded in these challenges, the threshold for accidental escalation at Scarborough Shoal has shifted.

Related Posts

Leave a Comment