Free Aesthetic Treatment leads to Severe Cold Burns, Court Awards Compensation

Two men from the La Spezia province experienced a harrowing ordeal after participating in a complimentary aesthetic treatment. The procedure, intended to be a risk-free way to reduce fat, resulted in notable cold burns that necessitated emergency medical intervention. The Civil Court of La Spezia has ruled in favor of the men, ordering both the medical clinic and the equipment manufacturer to pay significant compensation.

The Incident: A Cryolipolysis Treatment Gone Wrong

The incident unfolded in the autumn of 2021 during a cryolipolysis session. Cryolipolysis, a non-invasive procedure, aims to eliminate localized fat deposits by exposing them to freezing temperatures. In this instance, the clinic offered the treatment free of charge, using equipment from a third-party company they were considering purchasing. The intention was to evaluate the device’s effectiveness.

However, the treatment quickly turned problematic.Both men reported experiencing intense pain during the procedure.Despite their discomfort, the technician operating the machine, an employee of the equipment manufacturer, continued the session. Post-treatment, the men suffered severe burning sensations in the treated areas. The following day, they sought medical attention at Sant’andrea Hospital, where doctors diagnosed second and third-degree cold burns.

…an imprudent conduct when, while manifesting both strong pains during the administration of the treatment, did not have the interruption…

Legal Recourse and court Ruling

Efforts to resolve the matter amicably through mediation proved unsuccessful. Consequently, the men pursued legal action, represented by attorney Luca Bicci. The court,presided over by Judge Gabriele Romano,sided with the plaintiffs. The ruling held the medical clinic accountable for “imprudent conduct” for failing to halt the treatment despite the patients’ complaints of severe pain. The equipment manufacturer was deemed liable as the producer and owner of the device that caused the injuries, and for the actions of their technician who directed and executed the harmful treatment.

Both the clinic and the company have been ordered to cover the legal costs associated with the case. This ruling highlights the importance of proper training,patient monitoring,and adherence to safety protocols in the administration of aesthetic treatments like cryolipolysis.

…whose use caused the damage suffered by men, as well as to have – through a technician in charge – concretely directed and executed the treatment. harmful, positioning the handcuffs and setting the parameters of the machine.

The Broader Context: risks and Regulations in Aesthetic Treatments

This case underscores the potential risks associated with aesthetic procedures, even those marketed as non-invasive. While cryolipolysis is generally considered safe,complications such as paradoxical adipose hyperplasia (PAH),nerve damage,and,as seen in this case,burns,can occur. According to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the number of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures performed in the United States continues to rise, emphasizing the need for stringent regulations and qualified practitioners.

Consumers considering aesthetic treatments shoudl thoroughly research the procedure, the practitioner’s qualifications, and the potential risks involved. It is crucial to choose reputable clinics with experienced staff and to ensure that all equipment is properly maintained and operated. Furthermore, patients should feel empowered to voice any concerns or discomfort during treatment and expect immediate action from the practitioner.